THE ULTIMATE GUIDE TO H4831 VS H4831SC

The Ultimate Guide To h4831 vs h4831sc

The Ultimate Guide To h4831 vs h4831sc

Blog Article

I picked up a 50ct. box of one hundred sixty Nosler Accubonds, but I am hesitant to burn up the powder and projectiles on workup when all I have is fifty bullets. But I really want to locate a bullet in the a hundred and sixty class that my more mature rifle likes.

H4831SC Powder accessible in inventory now. Ballistically, this Excessive Extruded powder is the precise duplicate of H4831. Physically, it has a shorter grain sizing, thus, the designation SC or limited Reduce. The shorter, extra compact kernels enable the powder to movement with the powder steps additional smoothly, assisting to ease the continuous chopping of granules.

The obvious induce is actually a tough/ruff bore. No volume of copper fouling lessening agents while in the powder will almost certainly right this.

243, and many of the loads I've started out with consist of, you guessed it, H-4831sc. This time I am about to shoot the IMR7828 loads first, followed by the W780 loads just so there will not be any surprises in the event the H-4831sc loads display a shotgun pattern! Who understands, I just may possibly look for a use for it In the end.

My working experience is that the SC and SSC loaded to a similar bodyweight given that the extended Slash exhibits a lowered velocity.

Given that there would not appear to be any "Formal" Load Data available for this Load, can several of you present a starting point with this mixture and things to think about when Doing the job this Load up?

I have used each and employed the exact same expenses and also have not been capable of explain to any noticable discrepancies with general performance. the SC Edition meters a bit smoother is about all. any remarks??

Like mentioned above, very same stuff. Everything is different is the dimensions of h4831sc your kernels. I did hear someplace that they're going to only make the SC in the future. I have no idea if that is correct or not but would seem sensible to me. I use SC due to the fact which is what I located in the eight lb jug and it works.

With the smoother h4831 vs h4831sc flow traits arrives far more uniform cost weights, although the individual grains orient much more compactly, making better loading density.

You might have to generate a handful of a lot more posts to receive cleared to complete PM's. As soon as you reach that status I would write-up inside the labeled reloading portion to determine if any individual is in your area for just a trade. Click to broaden...

Despite the similarity in nomenclature, They are entirely distinctive powders, with IMR 4831 staying considerably speedier when compared to the Hodgdon variants. Really don't address them as the same powder, since they most unquestionably are usually not.

The "SC" stands for Shorter Lower. I haven't observed a distinction between possibly powder dut I don't Assume I would combine them.

I usually usually obtain the sc Edition. Using a powder measure it hangs up much less as a result of shorter kernels and I believe permits a lot more steady metering so significantly less time you're taking trickling in the last little bit of demand for making body weight. So in essence the SC will save you instances

NBTs or Hornady VMax, but Have got a restricted source of Varget, as well as a lot far more accessible H4831SC. I shoot fifty five gr. loads almost solely, for the reason that that is certainly h4831sc just what the rifles shoot the most effective.

Report this page